Prompt review
Open-source and self-hosted AI visibility · the prompts themselves, from the answers they got since 2026-07-26: 3 finished runs, 168 graded answers. Each prompt is read under the wording it was last asked in. Free: computed from stored answers, no model calls. · JSON
15prompts
0healthy
26flags
13gaps
3not enough data yet
Flat 10
Named and recommended never varied across the runs, and no fix attempt for it moved it.
| Prompt | Numbers | Suggestion |
|---|---|---|
| Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? open-source-alternative-profound-peec always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 2 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 2 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| We want to track AI answer visibility without sending our data to another SaaS vendor. What are our options? want-track-ai-answer-visibility always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 2 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 2 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| Should we build our own AI visibility tracker on the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, or buy a tool? build-own-ai-visibility-tracker always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 2 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 2 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| Is there a self-hosted AI visibility tracker I can run in Docker? self-hosted-ai-visibility-docker always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 3 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 3 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| Can we run an AI search visibility tracker on our own Kubernetes cluster? ai-visibility-tracker-kubernetes always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 2 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 2 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| Which AI visibility tools let us use our own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys? ai-visibility-bring-own-api-keys always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 2 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 2 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| How much does it cost in API fees to run our own AI visibility checks every day, and how do we cap it? cost-run-own-ai-visibility-checks always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 2 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 2 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| We want every raw AI answer and citation behind an AI visibility score, not just a dashboard. Which tools give us that? raw-answers-citations-behind-score always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it) |
| What's a good open-source way for a developer-tools startup to check whether AI assistants recommend it over alternatives? devtools-startup-open-source-ai-visibility always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 2 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 2 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
| Can I test the same buyer questions against several AI models and compare the answers? test-same-buyer-questions-against always_absent | named in 0 of 12 answers over 3 runs; 3 fix attempts targeted it and none moved it | tells you little; consider rewording or retiring it. Either Cheap Seats can't win this question (reword it toward what Cheap Seats does, or retire it), or it's the most important gap in the set (keep it, and work the fix list for it). 3 fix attempts for it are still waiting for an outcome: wait for them first |
Noisy 0
The named rate moves more from run to run than sampling explains, or answers in one run disagree.
None.
Off target 11
The answers mostly name products outside the category.
| Prompt | Numbers | Suggestion |
|---|---|---|
| Are there open-source tools for measuring AI search visibility? open-source-tools-measuring-ai | 20% of 142 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (7 of 12 competitors named at all); "ChatGPT", not a configured competitor, is named in 7 of 12 answers, more than Cheap Seats or any competitor ChatGPT ×7, Perplexity ×7, Google AI Overviews ×6, promptfoo ×6, Gemini ×5 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "ChatGPT" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? open-source-alternative-profound-peec | 28% of 127 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (7 of 12 competitors named at all) ChatGPT ×6, Promptfoo ×6, Gemini ×5, Langfuse ×5, Perplexity ×5 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "ChatGPT" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| We want to track AI answer visibility without sending our data to another SaaS vendor. What are our options? want-track-ai-answer-visibility | 8% of 185 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (5 of 12 competitors named at all); "ChatGPT", not a configured competitor, is named in 9 of 12 answers, more than Cheap Seats or any competitor ChatGPT ×9, Gemini ×7, Metabase ×7, Perplexity ×7, Claude ×6 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "ChatGPT" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| Should we build our own AI visibility tracker on the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, or buy a tool? build-own-ai-visibility-tracker | 27% of 145 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (5 of 12 competitors named at all) Anthropic ×11, OpenAI ×11, ChatGPT ×9, Claude ×8, Perplexity ×7 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "Anthropic" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| Is there a self-hosted AI visibility tracker I can run in Docker? self-hosted-ai-visibility-docker | 21% of 134 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (7 of 12 competitors named at all); "ChatGPT", not a configured competitor, is named in 9 of 12 answers, more than Cheap Seats or any competitor ChatGPT ×9, Gemini ×7, Perplexity ×7, Google AI Overviews ×6, Metabase ×5 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "ChatGPT" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| Can we run an AI search visibility tracker on our own Kubernetes cluster? ai-visibility-tracker-kubernetes | 18% of 162 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (7 of 12 competitors named at all); "ChatGPT", not a configured competitor, is named in 9 of 12 answers, more than Cheap Seats or any competitor ChatGPT ×9, Kubernetes ×8, Perplexity ×8, Gemini ×7, OpenAI ×7 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "ChatGPT" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| Which AI visibility tools let us use our own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys? ai-visibility-bring-own-api-keys | 21% of 150 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (7 of 12 competitors named at all) Anthropic ×7, ChatGPT ×7, OpenAI ×7, Claude ×6, Promptfoo ×6 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "Anthropic" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| How much does it cost in API fees to run our own AI visibility checks every day, and how do we cap it? cost-run-own-ai-visibility-checks | 17% of 94 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (4 of 12 competitors named at all); "OpenAI", not a configured competitor, is named in 10 of 12 answers, more than Cheap Seats or any competitor OpenAI ×10, ChatGPT ×9, Anthropic ×7, Gemini ×6, Google ×6 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "OpenAI" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| Can I run AI visibility checks from the command line or in a CI pipeline? ai-visibility-cli-ci | 24% of 123 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (7 of 12 competitors named at all) OpenAI ×7, GitHub Actions ×6, Perplexity ×6, Anthropic ×5, ChatGPT ×5 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "OpenAI" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| What's a good open-source way for a developer-tools startup to check whether AI assistants recommend it over alternatives? devtools-startup-open-source-ai-visibility | 11% of 132 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (6 of 12 competitors named at all); "ChatGPT", not a configured competitor, is named in 9 of 12 answers, more than Cheap Seats or any competitor ChatGPT ×9, promptfoo ×9, Claude ×7, Gemini ×6, Perplexity ×6 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "ChatGPT" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
| Can I test the same buyer questions against several AI models and compare the answers? test-same-buyer-questions-against | 22% of 111 product mentions are Cheap Seats or a configured competitor (6 of 12 competitors named at all); "Promptfoo", not a configured competitor, is named in 8 of 12 answers, more than Cheap Seats or any competitor Promptfoo ×8, ChatGPT ×5, Claude ×5, Gemini ×5, ChatHub ×4 | add context to the prompt (the category, who is asking) so it's answered about the products you compete with, or add "Promptfoo" to the competitors if it is in fact one |
Duplicates 0
Two prompts whose answers name nearly the same products, with the same verdicts.
None.
Rewritten by the assistant 5
The assistants search for this question in quite different words.
| Prompt | Numbers | Suggestion |
|---|---|---|
| We want to track AI answer visibility without sending our data to another SaaS vendor. What are our options? want-track-ai-answer-visibility | 14% of a search's words come from the prompt and it keeps 17% of the prompt's, over 9 searches | buyers' assistants search for different words: "brand", "open", "source", "geo", "github"; consider phrasing the prompt that way |
| Should we build our own AI visibility tracker on the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, or buy a tool? build-own-ai-visibility-tracker | 17% of a search's words come from the prompt and it keeps 24% of the prompt's, over 12 searches | buyers' assistants search for different words: "tracking", "api", "pricing", "chatgpt", "search"; consider phrasing the prompt that way |
| How much does it cost in API fees to run our own AI visibility checks every day, and how do we cap it? cost-run-own-ai-visibility-checks | 8% of a search's words come from the prompt and it keeps 9% of the prompt's, over 17 searches | buyers' assistants search for different words: "pricing", "search", "web", "2026", "per"; consider phrasing the prompt that way |
| What's a good open-source way for a developer-tools startup to check whether AI assistants recommend it over alternatives? devtools-startup-open-source-ai-visibility | 10% of a search's words come from the prompt and it keeps 10% of the prompt's, over 11 searches | buyers' assistants search for different words: "open", "source", "github", "llm", "brand"; consider phrasing the prompt that way |
| Can I test the same buyer questions against several AI models and compare the answers? test-same-buyer-questions-against | 19% of a search's words come from the prompt and it keeps 20% of the prompt's, over 9 searches | buyers' assistants search for different words: "prompts", "2026", "multiple", "side", "brand"; consider phrasing the prompt that way |
Branded leak 0
Outside head-to-heads, the prompt or its searches name the brand.
None.
Jev 4
What Jev makes of the prompts' wording alone, before any answers: two prompts one good answer would serve, a prompt about something other than what the brand does, one that reads as the other intent from the one it's set to, one that names the brand in a spelling the word match misses. Stored by cheapseats check, cheapseats review -jev and after each run; this page asks nothing. Each flag shows Jev's probability; a flag needs 0.7. 15 questions haven't been asked yet.
| Flag | Prompt | Jev says | Suggestion |
|---|---|---|---|
| duplicate | Are there open-source tools for measuring AI search visibility? {open-source-tools-measuring-ai Are there open-source tools for measuring AI search visibility? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {1 12 0.08333333333333333 0.014864709450773478 0.35388592179859524} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0.25 0] <nil> 0 [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {Peec AI 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Profound 5} {Bright Data 4} {Elmo 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Otterly.AI 4} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 3} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {Limelit Open 3} {Semrush AI Toolkit 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {Cheap Seats 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Bright Data 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] 0.204 142 7 0 map[absent:11 mentioned:1] 8 0.28 0.542 [brand geo github llm open source tracker tracking] 0 [off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.25 ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.16666666666666666 aperture:0.08333333333333333 athenahq:0.16666666666666666 auriti geo-optimizer-skill:0.08333333333333333 awesome-ai-visibility:0.16666666666666666 awesome-geo-tools:0.08333333333333333 barchart:0.08333333333333333 bright data:0.3333333333333333 canonry:0.25 chatgpt:0.5833333333333334 chatgpt search:0.08333333333333333 cheap seats:0.08333333333333333 citegeo:0.08333333333333333 citeladder:0.16666666666666666 claude:0.25 copilot:0.25 dataforseo:0.08333333333333333 deepeval:0.16666666666666666 elmo:0.3333333333333333 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo-bench:0.16666666666666666 geo-seo:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.25 getcito:0.3333333333333333 github:0.25 goaccess:0.08333333333333333 google:0.08333333333333333 google ai mode:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.5 grok:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.25 litellm:0.16666666666666666 llm visibility framework:0.08333333333333333 llms.txt:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.08333333333333333 mistral:0.08333333333333333 omnius:0.08333333333333333 oneglanse:0.3333333333333333 open-geo:0.08333333333333333 openai:0.16666666666666666 openalternative:0.08333333333333333 openlens:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 oranai orangeo:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.3333333333333333 peec ai:0.5 perplexity:0.5833333333333334 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:0.4166666666666667 promptfoo:0.5 ryze open-seo-mcp-skills:0.08333333333333333 scrunch:0.08333333333333333 scrunch ai:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.25 serpapi:0.08333333333333333 vigie:0.16666666666666666]} Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? {open-source-alternative-profound-peec Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0 0] <nil> 0 [{Peec AI 12} {Profound 12} {ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Elmo 5} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {Otterly.AI 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {Semrush AI Toolkit 2} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 1} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {Limelit Open 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] [{ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] 0.283 127 7 0 map[absent:12] 9 0.273 0.6 [github open source visibility geo search tracking brand] 0 [flat off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.08333333333333333 ai overviews:0.16666666666666666 alternativeto:0.08333333333333333 ansvisor:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.25 aperture:0.25 bright data:0.08333333333333333 canonry:0.3333333333333333 chatgpt:0.5 citeladder:0.08333333333333333 claude:0.16666666666666666 cloro:0.08333333333333333 cron:0.08333333333333333 elmo:0.4166666666666667 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo-aeo-tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geolook:0.08333333333333333 getcito:0.25 github:0.3333333333333333 github actions:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.3333333333333333 grafana:0.25 habibi:0.16666666666666666 hearsay:0.08333333333333333 hubspot:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.08333333333333333 llmrefs:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.25 oneglanse:0.25 openai:0.3333333333333333 openalternative:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.25 peec ai:1 perplexity:0.4166666666666667 perplexity sonar api:0.08333333333333333 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:1 promptfoo:0.5 python:0.08333333333333333 rankscale:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.16666666666666666 sqlite:0.08333333333333333 superlines:0.08333333333333333]} | open-source-tools-measuring-ai and open-source-alternative-profound-peec may ask the same thing (0.73) | Merge them to save answers: keep one, retire the other. |
| duplicate | We want to track AI answer visibility without sending our data to another SaaS vendor. What are our options? {open-source-tools-measuring-ai Are there open-source tools for measuring AI search visibility? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {1 12 0.08333333333333333 0.014864709450773478 0.35388592179859524} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0.25 0] <nil> 0 [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {Peec AI 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Profound 5} {Bright Data 4} {Elmo 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Otterly.AI 4} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 3} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {Limelit Open 3} {Semrush AI Toolkit 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {Cheap Seats 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Bright Data 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] 0.204 142 7 0 map[absent:11 mentioned:1] 8 0.28 0.542 [brand geo github llm open source tracker tracking] 0 [off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.25 ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.16666666666666666 aperture:0.08333333333333333 athenahq:0.16666666666666666 auriti geo-optimizer-skill:0.08333333333333333 awesome-ai-visibility:0.16666666666666666 awesome-geo-tools:0.08333333333333333 barchart:0.08333333333333333 bright data:0.3333333333333333 canonry:0.25 chatgpt:0.5833333333333334 chatgpt search:0.08333333333333333 cheap seats:0.08333333333333333 citegeo:0.08333333333333333 citeladder:0.16666666666666666 claude:0.25 copilot:0.25 dataforseo:0.08333333333333333 deepeval:0.16666666666666666 elmo:0.3333333333333333 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo-bench:0.16666666666666666 geo-seo:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.25 getcito:0.3333333333333333 github:0.25 goaccess:0.08333333333333333 google:0.08333333333333333 google ai mode:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.5 grok:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.25 litellm:0.16666666666666666 llm visibility framework:0.08333333333333333 llms.txt:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.08333333333333333 mistral:0.08333333333333333 omnius:0.08333333333333333 oneglanse:0.3333333333333333 open-geo:0.08333333333333333 openai:0.16666666666666666 openalternative:0.08333333333333333 openlens:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 oranai orangeo:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.3333333333333333 peec ai:0.5 perplexity:0.5833333333333334 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:0.4166666666666667 promptfoo:0.5 ryze open-seo-mcp-skills:0.08333333333333333 scrunch:0.08333333333333333 scrunch ai:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.25 serpapi:0.08333333333333333 vigie:0.16666666666666666]} Can we run an AI search visibility tracker on our own Kubernetes cluster? {open-source-alternative-profound-peec Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0 0] <nil> 0 [{Peec AI 12} {Profound 12} {ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Elmo 5} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {Otterly.AI 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {Semrush AI Toolkit 2} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 1} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {Limelit Open 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] [{ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] 0.283 127 7 0 map[absent:12] 9 0.273 0.6 [github open source visibility geo search tracking brand] 0 [flat off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.08333333333333333 ai overviews:0.16666666666666666 alternativeto:0.08333333333333333 ansvisor:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.25 aperture:0.25 bright data:0.08333333333333333 canonry:0.3333333333333333 chatgpt:0.5 citeladder:0.08333333333333333 claude:0.16666666666666666 cloro:0.08333333333333333 cron:0.08333333333333333 elmo:0.4166666666666667 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo-aeo-tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geolook:0.08333333333333333 getcito:0.25 github:0.3333333333333333 github actions:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.3333333333333333 grafana:0.25 habibi:0.16666666666666666 hearsay:0.08333333333333333 hubspot:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.08333333333333333 llmrefs:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.25 oneglanse:0.25 openai:0.3333333333333333 openalternative:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.25 peec ai:1 perplexity:0.4166666666666667 perplexity sonar api:0.08333333333333333 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:1 promptfoo:0.5 python:0.08333333333333333 rankscale:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.16666666666666666 sqlite:0.08333333333333333 superlines:0.08333333333333333]} | want-track-ai-answer-visibility and ai-visibility-tracker-kubernetes may ask the same thing (0.75) | Merge them to save answers: keep one, retire the other. |
| duplicate | We want to track AI answer visibility without sending our data to another SaaS vendor. What are our options? {open-source-tools-measuring-ai Are there open-source tools for measuring AI search visibility? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {1 12 0.08333333333333333 0.014864709450773478 0.35388592179859524} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0.25 0] <nil> 0 [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {Peec AI 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Profound 5} {Bright Data 4} {Elmo 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Otterly.AI 4} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 3} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {Limelit Open 3} {Semrush AI Toolkit 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {Cheap Seats 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Bright Data 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] 0.204 142 7 0 map[absent:11 mentioned:1] 8 0.28 0.542 [brand geo github llm open source tracker tracking] 0 [off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.25 ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.16666666666666666 aperture:0.08333333333333333 athenahq:0.16666666666666666 auriti geo-optimizer-skill:0.08333333333333333 awesome-ai-visibility:0.16666666666666666 awesome-geo-tools:0.08333333333333333 barchart:0.08333333333333333 bright data:0.3333333333333333 canonry:0.25 chatgpt:0.5833333333333334 chatgpt search:0.08333333333333333 cheap seats:0.08333333333333333 citegeo:0.08333333333333333 citeladder:0.16666666666666666 claude:0.25 copilot:0.25 dataforseo:0.08333333333333333 deepeval:0.16666666666666666 elmo:0.3333333333333333 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo-bench:0.16666666666666666 geo-seo:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.25 getcito:0.3333333333333333 github:0.25 goaccess:0.08333333333333333 google:0.08333333333333333 google ai mode:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.5 grok:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.25 litellm:0.16666666666666666 llm visibility framework:0.08333333333333333 llms.txt:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.08333333333333333 mistral:0.08333333333333333 omnius:0.08333333333333333 oneglanse:0.3333333333333333 open-geo:0.08333333333333333 openai:0.16666666666666666 openalternative:0.08333333333333333 openlens:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 oranai orangeo:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.3333333333333333 peec ai:0.5 perplexity:0.5833333333333334 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:0.4166666666666667 promptfoo:0.5 ryze open-seo-mcp-skills:0.08333333333333333 scrunch:0.08333333333333333 scrunch ai:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.25 serpapi:0.08333333333333333 vigie:0.16666666666666666]} Which AI visibility tools let us use our own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys? {open-source-alternative-profound-peec Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0 0] <nil> 0 [{Peec AI 12} {Profound 12} {ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Elmo 5} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {Otterly.AI 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {Semrush AI Toolkit 2} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 1} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {Limelit Open 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] [{ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] 0.283 127 7 0 map[absent:12] 9 0.273 0.6 [github open source visibility geo search tracking brand] 0 [flat off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.08333333333333333 ai overviews:0.16666666666666666 alternativeto:0.08333333333333333 ansvisor:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.25 aperture:0.25 bright data:0.08333333333333333 canonry:0.3333333333333333 chatgpt:0.5 citeladder:0.08333333333333333 claude:0.16666666666666666 cloro:0.08333333333333333 cron:0.08333333333333333 elmo:0.4166666666666667 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo-aeo-tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geolook:0.08333333333333333 getcito:0.25 github:0.3333333333333333 github actions:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.3333333333333333 grafana:0.25 habibi:0.16666666666666666 hearsay:0.08333333333333333 hubspot:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.08333333333333333 llmrefs:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.25 oneglanse:0.25 openai:0.3333333333333333 openalternative:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.25 peec ai:1 perplexity:0.4166666666666667 perplexity sonar api:0.08333333333333333 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:1 promptfoo:0.5 python:0.08333333333333333 rankscale:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.16666666666666666 sqlite:0.08333333333333333 superlines:0.08333333333333333]} | want-track-ai-answer-visibility and ai-visibility-bring-own-api-keys may ask the same thing (0.77) | Merge them to save answers: keep one, retire the other. |
| duplicate | What's a good open-source way for a developer-tools startup to check whether AI assistants recommend it over alternatives? {open-source-tools-measuring-ai Are there open-source tools for measuring AI search visibility? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {1 12 0.08333333333333333 0.014864709450773478 0.35388592179859524} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0.25 0] <nil> 0 [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {Peec AI 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Profound 5} {Bright Data 4} {Elmo 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Otterly.AI 4} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 3} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {Limelit Open 3} {Semrush AI Toolkit 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {Cheap Seats 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] [{ChatGPT 7} {Perplexity 7} {Google AI Overviews 6} {promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Bright Data 4} {GetCito 4} {OneGlanse 4} {Claude 3} {Copilot 3} {GEO/AEO Tracker 3} {GitHub 3} {canonry 3} {Anthropic 2} {AthenaHQ 2} {CiteLadder 2} {DeepEval 2} {GEO-bench 2} {LiteLLM 2} {OpenAI 2} {OpenLens 2} {Scrunch AI 2} {Vigie 2} {awesome-ai-visibility 2} {Aperture 1} {Auriti geo-optimizer-skill 1} {Barchart 1} {ChatGPT Search 1} {CiteGEO 1} {DataForSEO 1} {GEO Tracker 1} {GEO-SEO 1} {GoAccess 1} {Google 1} {Google AI Mode 1} {Grok 1} {LLM Visibility Framework 1} {Metabase 1} {Mistral 1} {Omnius 1} {OpenAlternative 1} {OpenRouter 1} {OranAi orangeo 1} {Postgres 1} {Ryze open-seo-mcp-skills 1} {Scrunch 1} {SearchMirror 1} {SerpApi 1} {ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt 1} {awesome-geo-tools 1} {llms.txt 1} {open-geo 1}] 0.204 142 7 0 map[absent:11 mentioned:1] 8 0.28 0.542 [brand geo github llm open source tracker tracking] 0 [off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.25 ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.16666666666666666 aperture:0.08333333333333333 athenahq:0.16666666666666666 auriti geo-optimizer-skill:0.08333333333333333 awesome-ai-visibility:0.16666666666666666 awesome-geo-tools:0.08333333333333333 barchart:0.08333333333333333 bright data:0.3333333333333333 canonry:0.25 chatgpt:0.5833333333333334 chatgpt search:0.08333333333333333 cheap seats:0.08333333333333333 citegeo:0.08333333333333333 citeladder:0.16666666666666666 claude:0.25 copilot:0.25 dataforseo:0.08333333333333333 deepeval:0.16666666666666666 elmo:0.3333333333333333 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo-bench:0.16666666666666666 geo-seo:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.25 getcito:0.3333333333333333 github:0.25 goaccess:0.08333333333333333 google:0.08333333333333333 google ai mode:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.5 grok:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.25 litellm:0.16666666666666666 llm visibility framework:0.08333333333333333 llms.txt:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.08333333333333333 mistral:0.08333333333333333 omnius:0.08333333333333333 oneglanse:0.3333333333333333 open-geo:0.08333333333333333 openai:0.16666666666666666 openalternative:0.08333333333333333 openlens:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 oranai orangeo:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.3333333333333333 peec ai:0.5 perplexity:0.5833333333333334 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:0.4166666666666667 promptfoo:0.5 ryze open-seo-mcp-skills:0.08333333333333333 scrunch:0.08333333333333333 scrunch ai:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.25 serpapi:0.08333333333333333 vigie:0.16666666666666666]} How do we find out whether coding assistants recommend our library or API when developers ask how to do something? {open-source-alternative-profound-peec Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? false 3 12 true 2026-10-21 [asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them] {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} {0 12 0 0 0.2425007574992425} [0 0 0] <nil> 0 [{Peec AI 12} {Profound 12} {ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Elmo 5} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {Otterly.AI 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {Semrush AI Toolkit 2} {Ahrefs Brand Radar 1} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {Limelit Open 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] [{ChatGPT 6} {Promptfoo 6} {Gemini 5} {Langfuse 5} {Perplexity 5} {Canonry 4} {GitHub 4} {Google AI Overviews 4} {OpenAI 4} {Anthropic 3} {Aperture 3} {GetCito 3} {Grafana 3} {Metabase 3} {OneGlanse 3} {AI Overviews 2} {Claude 2} {Habibi 2} {OpenAlternative 2} {Rankscale 2} {AlternativeTo 1} {Ansvisor 1} {Bright Data 1} {CiteLadder 1} {Cloro 1} {GEO/AEO Tracker 1} {GeoLook 1} {GitHub Actions 1} {Hearsay 1} {HubSpot 1} {LLMrefs 1} {OpenRouter 1} {Perplexity Sonar API 1} {Postgres 1} {Python 1} {SQLite 1} {Superlines 1} {cron 1} {geo-aeo-tracker 1} {searchmirror 1}] 0.283 127 7 0 map[absent:12] 9 0.273 0.6 [github open source visibility geo search tracking brand] 0 [flat off_target] map[ahrefs brand radar:0.08333333333333333 ai overviews:0.16666666666666666 alternativeto:0.08333333333333333 ansvisor:0.08333333333333333 anthropic:0.25 aperture:0.25 bright data:0.08333333333333333 canonry:0.3333333333333333 chatgpt:0.5 citeladder:0.08333333333333333 claude:0.16666666666666666 cloro:0.08333333333333333 cron:0.08333333333333333 elmo:0.4166666666666667 gemini:0.4166666666666667 geo-aeo-tracker:0.08333333333333333 geo/aeo tracker:0.08333333333333333 geolook:0.08333333333333333 getcito:0.25 github:0.3333333333333333 github actions:0.08333333333333333 google ai overviews:0.3333333333333333 grafana:0.25 habibi:0.16666666666666666 hearsay:0.08333333333333333 hubspot:0.08333333333333333 langfuse:0.4166666666666667 limelit open:0.08333333333333333 llmrefs:0.08333333333333333 metabase:0.25 oneglanse:0.25 openai:0.3333333333333333 openalternative:0.16666666666666666 openrouter:0.08333333333333333 otterly.ai:0.25 peec ai:1 perplexity:0.4166666666666667 perplexity sonar api:0.08333333333333333 postgres:0.08333333333333333 profound:1 promptfoo:0.5 python:0.08333333333333333 rankscale:0.16666666666666666 searchmirror:0.08333333333333333 semrush ai toolkit:0.16666666666666666 sqlite:0.08333333333333333 superlines:0.08333333333333333]} | devtools-startup-open-source-ai-visibility and coding-assistants-recommend-our-library may ask the same thing (0.88) | Merge them to save answers: keep one, retire the other. |
Gaps 13
What the set's answers and searches keep coming back to that no prompt asks about: competitors and other products named often, and words the assistants add to searches across prompts. To measure one, paste its prompt into prompt-sets/self-hosted-ai-visibility.toml by pull request and reword it as your buyers would ask; prompt ids are permanent, so pick one you'll keep.
competitor Otterly.AI — named in 75 of 168 answers across 15 prompts, added to 33 searches, its pages cited in 10 answers; no prompt names it
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-otterly-ai" text = "What are the best alternatives to Otterly.AI?"
competitor Semrush AI Toolkit — named in 38 of 168 answers across 13 prompts, added to 2 searches, its pages cited in 0 answers; no prompt names it
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-semrush-ai" text = "What are the best alternatives to Semrush AI Toolkit?"
competitor Ahrefs Brand Radar — named in 36 of 168 answers across 12 prompts, added to 0 searches, its pages cited in 0 answers; no prompt names it
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-ahrefs-brand" text = "What are the best alternatives to Ahrefs Brand Radar?"
competitor Elmo — named in 25 of 168 answers across 7 prompts, added to 4 searches, its pages cited in 9 answers; no prompt names it
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-elmo" text = "What are the best alternatives to Elmo?"
product Perplexity — named in 81 of 168 answers across 15 prompts, but neither a configured competitor nor in any prompt
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-perplexity" text = "What are the best alternatives to Perplexity?"
Or, if it is a competitor, add it to the set's competitors:
[[competitors]] name = "Perplexity"
product Gemini — named in 77 of 168 answers across 15 prompts, but neither a configured competitor nor in any prompt
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-gemini" text = "What are the best alternatives to Gemini?"
Or, if it is a competitor, add it to the set's competitors:
[[competitors]] name = "Gemini"
product Google AI Overviews — named in 52 of 168 answers across 15 prompts, but neither a configured competitor nor in any prompt
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-google-ai" text = "What are the best alternatives to Google AI Overviews?"
Or, if it is a competitor, add it to the set's competitors:
[[competitors]] name = "Google AI Overviews"
product promptfoo — named in 51 of 168 answers across 10 prompts, but neither a configured competitor nor in any prompt
[[prompts]] id = "what-best-alternatives-promptfoo" text = "What are the best alternatives to promptfoo?"
Or, if it is a competitor, add it to the set's competitors:
[[competitors]] name = "promptfoo"
topic source — added to 60 searches across 13 prompts; no prompt uses the word
From the search “open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub”.
[[prompts]] id = "open-source-self-hosted-ai" text = "Open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub?"
topic open — added to 56 searches across 11 prompts; no prompt uses the word
From the search “open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub”.
[[prompts]] id = "open-source-self-hosted-ai-2" text = "Open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub?"
topic tracking — added to 51 searches across 14 prompts; no prompt uses the word
From the search “AI brand monitoring ChatGPT Claude scheduled prompts weekly tracking answers Peec Profound Otterly”.
[[prompts]] id = "ai-brand-monitoring-chatgpt-claude" text = "AI brand monitoring ChatGPT Claude scheduled prompts weekly tracking answers Peec Profound Otterly?"
topic llm — added to 47 searches across 15 prompts; no prompt uses the word
From the search “open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub”.
[[prompts]] id = "open-source-self-hosted-ai-3" text = "Open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub?"
topic github — added to 47 searches across 11 prompts; no prompt uses the word
From the search “open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub”.
[[prompts]] id = "open-source-self-hosted-ai-4" text = "Open source self-hosted AI visibility tracker LLM brand mentions Docker GitHub?"
Not enough data yet
A prompt is reviewed once it has 3 runs and 6 graded answers under one wording in the window.
automate-weekly-ai-answer-checks, coding-assistants-recommend-our-library, cheapest-in-house-ai-visibility-tracking
Proposed edits
Every prompt
| Prompt | Runs | Answers | Named | Recommended | From prompt | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are there open-source tools for measuring AI search visibility? open-source-tools-measuring-ai asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 8% (1–35) | 0% (0–24) | 28% | off_target |
| Is there an open-source alternative to Profound or Peec AI? open-source-alternative-profound-peec asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 27% | flat off_target |
| We want to track AI answer visibility without sending our data to another SaaS vendor. What are our options? want-track-ai-answer-visibility asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 14% | flat off_target rewritten |
| Should we build our own AI visibility tracker on the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, or buy a tool? build-own-ai-visibility-tracker asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 17% | flat off_target rewritten |
| Is there a self-hosted AI visibility tracker I can run in Docker? self-hosted-ai-visibility-docker asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 37% | flat off_target |
| Can we run an AI search visibility tracker on our own Kubernetes cluster? ai-visibility-tracker-kubernetes asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 29% | flat off_target |
| Which AI visibility tools let us use our own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys? ai-visibility-bring-own-api-keys asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 52% | flat off_target |
| How much does it cost in API fees to run our own AI visibility checks every day, and how do we cap it? cost-run-own-ai-visibility-checks asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 8% | flat off_target rewritten |
| Can I run AI visibility checks from the command line or in a CI pipeline? ai-visibility-cli-ci asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 8% (1–35) | 0% (0–24) | 29% | off_target |
| We want every raw AI answer and citation behind an AI visibility score, not just a dashboard. Which tools give us that? raw-answers-citations-behind-score asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 29% | flat |
| What's a good open-source way for a developer-tools startup to check whether AI assistants recommend it over alternatives? devtools-startup-open-source-ai-visibility asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 10% | flat off_target rewritten |
| Can I test the same buyer questions against several AI models and compare the answers? test-same-buyer-questions-against asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 3 | 12 | 0% (0–24) | 0% (0–24) | 19% | flat off_target rewritten |
| How can I automatically ask ChatGPT and Claude the same set of questions every week and track how their answers about my category change? automate-weekly-ai-answer-checks asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 2 | 8 | 0% (0–32) | 0% (0–32) | 9% | not enough data yet |
| How do we find out whether coding assistants recommend our library or API when developers ask how to do something? coding-assistants-recommend-our-library asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 2 | 8 | 0% (0–32) | 0% (0–32) | 26% | not enough data yet |
| What's the cheapest way to track our brand in AI answers ourselves instead of paying for a SaaS subscription? cheapest-in-house-ai-visibility-tracking asked or graded 2 ways in this window (a method change): the rates pool them | 2 | 8 | 0% (0–32) | 0% (0–32) | 12% | not enough data yet |
Review monthly: it's free, and a month of runs is what the flags need.