Quick wins
The fix lists from the latest run of every prompt set, core sets first, then fastest expected ranking gain: prompts a fix could flip per working day, each weighted by what it has left to win (one minus its recommended rate over the last two weeks; named, for an info prompt). Mark a fix with the commit or pull request you submitted for it; open leaves out the ones you have. A later fix for the same page stays open, with what was tried before.
Priorityall 8urgent 1high 6medium 1
Siteall 1elsewhere 1
Setall 12Finding out whether AI assistants recommend us 2Getting recommended instead of a competitor 4Choosing an AI visibility tool 4Cheap Seats head to heads 1Open-source and self-hosted AI visibility 1
Publish popcorn.zone/for/developer-tools showing the git/TOML, CLI, API and MCP workflow medium documentation effort S flips 1 Cheap Seats head to heads
Where: https://popcorn.zone/for/developer-tools
Must say: Make the developer-tools case concretely. Prompt sets are TOML in your own git repo, changed by pull request. There is a CLI, a JSON API and an MCP server, and it deploys with Docker, Helm or an exe.dev VM. Every answer is graded recommended, mentioned or absent with position and share of voice, not an opaque score; this directly answers P10's warning about tools that report 'only brand mentions or an opaque aggregate score'.
Done when: Re-running prompt 10 shows at least one answer naming Popcorn as a fit with a stated reason (git/TOML, MCP or per-answer grading), or citing this page.
Displaces: https://www.tryprofound.com/
Why: P10: if Popcorn 'only reports brand mentions or an opaque aggregate score it will not adequately answer the question'.
Prompt for Claude Code
# Publish popcorn.zone/for/developer-tools showing the git/TOML, CLI, API and MCP workflow When buyers ask an AI assistant the questions below, it doesn't recommend us, or recommends us for the wrong reasons. This is a documentation gap: the answer needed a page we don't have, or ours says the wrong thing. ## The questions it affects - Is Cheap Seats a good fit for a developer-tools company checking whether ChatGPT and Claude recommend it? ## What the assistant said P10: if Popcorn 'only reports brand mentions or an opaque aggregate score it will not adequately answer the question'. ## Who wins the question today https://www.tryprofound.com/. Read it and make sure our version answers everything it does, better. ## Your task Write or update the page at https://popcorn.zone/for/developer-tools so it closes this gap. Find where pages like this live in the repo, match their structure, front matter and tone, and make the change there. If the page exists, edit it rather than starting over. ## What it must say Make the developer-tools case concretely. Prompt sets are TOML in your own git repo, changed by pull request. There is a CLI, a JSON API and an MCP server, and it deploys with Docker, Helm or an exe.dev VM. Every answer is graded recommended, mentioned or absent with position and share of voice, not an opaque score; this directly answers P10's warning about tools that report 'only brand mentions or an opaque aggregate score'. ## Done when Re-running prompt 10 shows at least one answer naming Popcorn as a fit with a stated reason (git/TOML, MCP or per-answer grading), or citing this page. ## Rules - Don't invent numbers, benchmarks, prices, capabilities or customer names. Where a fact is needed and you can't find it in the repo or on our site, leave a clearly marked TODO saying exactly what to measure or who to ask. - Answer the questions above directly and early on the page, in the words buyers use. AI assistants quote pages that state the answer plainly. - Keep it scoped to this one fix. When you're done, summarise what you changed and list any TODOs.