Act on your results

Quick wins

The pages to improve first, ranked by the buyer questions they could help you win.

1 of 40 fixes

How fixes are ranked

The fix lists come from the latest run of every prompt set, core sets first, then fastest expected ranking gain: prompts a fix could flip per working day, each weighted by what it has left to win (one minus its recommended rate over the last two weeks; named, for an info prompt). Mark a fix with the commit or pull request you submitted for it; open leaves out the ones you have. A later fix for the same page stays open, with what was tried before.

Publish cheapseats.dev/docs/agencies on multi-client setup; confirm workspace supporthttps://cheapseats.dev/docs/agenciesdocumentation · Cheap Seats head to heads · cheapseats.dev/docslowEffort MCould flip 1 prompt

Where: https://cheapseats.dev/docs/agencies
Must say: Show how an agency models clients: one prompt set per client in TOML, multiple sites per brand, fix-list owners, and per-prompt-set rankings exported via the JSON API or MCP for reporting. First confirm whether separate client workspaces, per-client budgets and branded or white-label reports exist. If they do not, file them as a product gap, because GetIntel and LLM Pulse win on exactly those.
Done when: Re-running prompt 9, at least one search answer cites the page and states how Cheap Seats separates clients.
Displaces: https://getintel.ai/solutions/agencies/
Why: P9 codex search: GetIntel "explicitly documents separate client tracking, branded scheduled reports".

Prompt for Claude Code

# Publish cheapseats.dev/docs/agencies on multi-client setup; confirm workspace support

When buyers ask an AI assistant the questions below, it doesn't recommend us, or recommends us for the wrong reasons. This is a documentation gap: the answer needed a page we don't have, or ours says the wrong thing.

## The questions it affects
- Is Cheap Seats a good fit for an agency tracking AI visibility for many clients?

## What the assistant said
P9 codex search: GetIntel "explicitly documents separate client tracking, branded scheduled reports".

## Who wins the question today
https://getintel.ai/solutions/agencies/. Read it and make sure our version answers everything it does, better.

## Your task
Write or update the page at https://cheapseats.dev/docs/agencies so it closes this gap. Find where pages like this live in the repo, match their structure, front matter and tone, and make the change there. If the page exists, edit it rather than starting over.

## What it must say
Show how an agency models clients: one prompt set per client in TOML, multiple sites per brand, fix-list owners, and per-prompt-set rankings exported via the JSON API or MCP for reporting. First confirm whether separate client workspaces, per-client budgets and branded or white-label reports exist. If they do not, file them as a product gap, because GetIntel and LLM Pulse win on exactly those.

## Done when
Re-running prompt 9, at least one search answer cites the page and states how Cheap Seats separates clients.

## Rules
- Don't invent numbers, benchmarks, prices, capabilities or customer names. Where a fact is needed and you can't find it in the repo or on our site, leave a clearly marked TODO saying exactly what to measure or who to ask.
- Answer the questions above directly and early on the page, in the words buyers use. AI assistants quote pages that state the answer plainly.
- Keep it scoped to this one fix. When you're done, summarise what you changed and list any TODOs.

From this run →