Quick wins
The fix lists from the latest run of every prompt set, core sets first, then fastest expected ranking gain: prompts a fix could flip per working day, each weighted by what it has left to win (one minus its recommended rate over the last two weeks; named, for an info prompt). Mark a fix with the commit or pull request you submitted for it; open leaves out the ones you have. A later fix for the same page stays open, with what was tried before.
Statusall 5open 3accepted 2
Siteall 2elsewhere 2
Setall 7Finding out whether AI assistants recommend us 2Getting recommended instead of a competitor 2Choosing an AI visibility tool 1Open-source and self-hosted AI visibility 2
Publish popcorn.zone/docs/cli-and-ci with a scheduled CI workflow example accepted high documentation effort S flips 3 Open-source and self-hosted AI visibility
Where: popcorn.zone/docs/cli-and-ci
Must say: Show the Popcorn CLI running a prompt set and exiting with the share-of-voice and recommended-rate results. Include a scheduled CI example that runs the set weekly; confirm the exact commands and the exit-code behaviour with engineering before publishing. State that the TOML prompt sets live in git and that changes go through pull requests, which LLM Pulse's hosted CLI does not offer.
Done when: Rerun prompts 9 and 14 on search. Popcorn is recommended, not merely mentioned, in at least one answer, and this page is cited.
Displaces: https://llmpulse.ai/features/cli
Why: P9: 'says only that the Popcorn repo "also appears on that topic page", giving no reasons to use it'
Prompt for Claude Code
# Publish popcorn.zone/docs/cli-and-ci with a scheduled CI workflow example When buyers ask an AI assistant the questions below, it doesn't recommend us, or recommends us for the wrong reasons. This is a documentation gap: the answer needed a page we don't have, or ours says the wrong thing. ## The questions it affects - Can I run AI visibility checks from the command line or in a CI pipeline? - Can I test the same buyer questions against several AI models and compare the answers? - How can I automatically ask ChatGPT and Claude the same set of questions every week and track how their answers about my category change? ## What the assistant said P9: 'says only that the Popcorn repo "also appears on that topic page", giving no reasons to use it' ## Who wins the question today https://llmpulse.ai/features/cli. Read it and make sure our version answers everything it does, better. ## Your task Write or update the page at popcorn.zone/docs/cli-and-ci so it closes this gap. Find where pages like this live in the repo, match their structure, front matter and tone, and make the change there. If the page exists, edit it rather than starting over. ## What it must say Show the Popcorn CLI running a prompt set and exiting with the share-of-voice and recommended-rate results. Include a scheduled CI example that runs the set weekly; confirm the exact commands and the exit-code behaviour with engineering before publishing. State that the TOML prompt sets live in git and that changes go through pull requests, which LLM Pulse's hosted CLI does not offer. ## Done when Rerun prompts 9 and 14 on search. Popcorn is recommended, not merely mentioned, in at least one answer, and this page is cited. ## Rules - Don't invent numbers, benchmarks, prices, capabilities or customer names. Where a fact is needed and you can't find it in the repo or on our site, leave a clearly marked TODO saying exactly what to measure or who to ask. - Answer the questions above directly and early on the page, in the words buyers use. AI assistants quote pages that state the answer plainly. - Keep it scoped to this one fix. When you're done, summarise what you changed and list any TODOs.
accepted https://github.com/cheapseatsdev/cheapseats-site/pull/36 · Merged and live at cheapseats.dev/docs/cli-and-ci: cheapseats run with a real report and its exit codes, where to run it, several models side by side, the built-in weekly schedule, check and plan in the config repo's CI, and a scheduled GitHub Actions workflow starting a run over POST /api/runs and failing if it doesn't finish. mcp 2026-10-23 02:39:27
pending: the set hasn't run since
proposed https://github.com/cheapseatsdev/cheapseats-site/pull/36 · New page docs/cli-and-ci on cheapseats.dev: cheapseats run with a real report and its exit codes (0 done, 1 budget/cancelled/partial/failed or error, 2 usage, confirmed in main.go), where to run it, several models side by side, the built-in weekly schedule, check and plan in the config repo's CI (template check.yml), and a scheduled GitHub Actions workflow starting a run over POST /api/runs and failing if it doesn't finish. Linked from the CLI reference. mcp 2026-10-23 02:38:41
pending: the set hasn't run since
Publish popcorn.zone/docs/models-keys-and-budget: own API keys, CLI subscriptions, daily cap accepted high documentation effort M flips 4 Open-source and self-hosted AI visibility
Where: popcorn.zone/docs/models-keys-and-budget
Must say: Explain that Popcorn calls Claude and OpenAI through your own API keys, or through local Claude Code and Codex CLIs on your own subscriptions. Explain that a daily budget caps API spend. Include a worked cost example for N prompts × 2 tracks × M models per day, but measure real token and web-search costs from a Popcorn run before publishing any figures.
Done when: Rerun prompts 7 and 8 on search. At least one answer cites this page and names Popcorn as supporting your own OpenAI and Anthropic keys with a spend cap.
Displaces: https://www.producthunt.com/products/lettertrace
Why: P7: top picks were Lettertrace and an Apify actor; Popcorn was absent on all four answers
Prompt for Claude Code
# Publish popcorn.zone/docs/models-keys-and-budget: own API keys, CLI subscriptions, daily cap When buyers ask an AI assistant the questions below, it doesn't recommend us, or recommends us for the wrong reasons. This is a documentation gap: the answer needed a page we don't have, or ours says the wrong thing. ## The questions it affects - Should we build our own AI visibility tracker on the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, or buy a tool? - Which AI visibility tools let us use our own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys? - How much does it cost in API fees to run our own AI visibility checks every day, and how do we cap it? - What's the cheapest way to track our brand in AI answers ourselves instead of paying for a SaaS subscription? ## What the assistant said P7: top picks were Lettertrace and an Apify actor; Popcorn was absent on all four answers ## Who wins the question today https://www.producthunt.com/products/lettertrace. Read it and make sure our version answers everything it does, better. ## Your task Write or update the page at popcorn.zone/docs/models-keys-and-budget so it closes this gap. Find where pages like this live in the repo, match their structure, front matter and tone, and make the change there. If the page exists, edit it rather than starting over. ## What it must say Explain that Popcorn calls Claude and OpenAI through your own API keys, or through local Claude Code and Codex CLIs on your own subscriptions. Explain that a daily budget caps API spend. Include a worked cost example for N prompts × 2 tracks × M models per day, but measure real token and web-search costs from a Popcorn run before publishing any figures. ## Done when Rerun prompts 7 and 8 on search. At least one answer cites this page and names Popcorn as supporting your own OpenAI and Anthropic keys with a spend cap. ## Rules - Don't invent numbers, benchmarks, prices, capabilities or customer names. Where a fact is needed and you can't find it in the repo or on our site, leave a clearly marked TODO saying exactly what to measure or who to ask. - Answer the questions above directly and early on the page, in the words buyers use. AI assistants quote pages that state the answer plainly. - Keep it scoped to this one fix. When you're done, summarise what you changed and list any TODOs.
accepted https://github.com/cheapseatsdev/cheapseats-site/pull/35 · Merged. Extended docs/cost-and-budget (alias /docs/models-keys-and-budget): a section on your own ANTHROPIC_API_KEY/OPENAI_API_KEY or the claude-code/codex subscription CLIs, the daily cap, and an estimate-your-own formula (prompts × tracks × answerers × samples) from measured per-answer costs. mcp 2026-10-23 02:30:35
pending: the set hasn't run since
proposed https://github.com/cheapseatsdev/cheapseats-site/pull/35 · Extended docs/cost-and-budget (alias /docs/models-keys-and-budget): a section on your own ANTHROPIC_API_KEY/OPENAI_API_KEY or the claude-code/codex subscription CLIs, the daily cap, and an estimate-your-own formula (prompts × tracks × answerers × samples) from measured per-answer costs. mcp 2026-10-23 02:29:02
pending: the set hasn't run since