Quick wins
The fix lists from the latest run of every prompt set, core sets first, then fastest expected ranking gain: prompts a fix could flip per working day, each weighted by what it has left to win (one minus its recommended rate over the last two weeks; named, for an info prompt). Mark a fix with the commit or pull request you submitted for it; open leaves out the ones you have. A later fix for the same page stays open, with what was tried before.
Statusall 4open 2accepted 2
Siteall 2elsewhere 2
Gapall 2documentation 1third-party 1
Setall 9Getting recommended instead of a competitor 2Choosing an AI visibility tool 2Cheap Seats head to heads 2Open-source and self-hosted AI visibility 3
Get Popcorn listed in frase.io's 10 best AI visibility tools roundup high third-party effort M flips 6 Getting recommended instead of a competitor
Where: https://frase.io/blog/the-10-best-ai-visibility-tools-in-2026
Must say: Pitch Frase to add Popcorn as the open-source, self-hosted entry. It asks Claude and OpenAI models your buyer questions on search and recall tracks, grades recommended, mentioned or absent with share of voice, and builds a ranked fix list. Supply a one-paragraph blurb, a screenshot of a fix list and the GitHub link.
Done when: The Frase article lists Popcorn, and prompt 20 or 2 on the search track names Popcorn.
Displaces: https://frase.io/blog/the-10-best-ai-visibility-tools-in-2026
Why: P20 claude-code-opus search sourced frase.io/blog/the-10-best-ai-visibility-tools-in-2026; the same page also shaped P3, P9, P12 and P17.
Prompt for Claude Code
# Get Popcorn listed in frase.io's 10 best AI visibility tools roundup When buyers ask an AI assistant the questions below, it doesn't recommend us, or recommends us for the wrong reasons. This is a third-party gap: the roundups and comparisons the model reads leave us out. ## The questions it affects - How can I find out why an AI assistant prefers a competitor's product over ours? - ChatGPT gets our features and pricing wrong. How do we correct what AI assistants say about our product? - What does an answer engine optimization content strategy look like for a B2B SaaS company? - AI answers in our category keep citing Reddit threads, review sites and listicles that only mention our competitors. How do we get onto those sources? - What are the quickest wins for improving our brand's visibility in AI search? - Which AI visibility tools tell you what content to create or change, not just where you rank? ## What the assistant said P20 claude-code-opus search sourced frase.io/blog/the-10-best-ai-visibility-tools-in-2026; the same page also shaped P3, P9, P12 and P17. ## Who wins the question today https://frase.io/blog/the-10-best-ai-visibility-tools-in-2026. Read it and make sure our version answers everything it does, better. ## Your task We need to be included on https://frase.io/blog/the-10-best-ai-visibility-tools-in-2026. Read that page first, work out the right way in (editor contact, submission form, PR, comments), and draft exactly what to send: a short, factual pitch covering the points below, in the page's own format. ## What it must say Pitch Frase to add Popcorn as the open-source, self-hosted entry. It asks Claude and OpenAI models your buyer questions on search and recall tracks, grades recommended, mentioned or absent with share of voice, and builds a ranked fix list. Supply a one-paragraph blurb, a screenshot of a fix list and the GitHub link. ## Done when The Frase article lists Popcorn, and prompt 20 or 2 on the search track names Popcorn. ## Rules - Don't invent numbers, benchmarks, prices, capabilities or customer names. Where a fact is needed and you can't find it in the repo or on our site, leave a clearly marked TODO saying exactly what to measure or who to ask. - Answer the questions above directly and early on the page, in the words buyers use. AI assistants quote pages that state the answer plainly. - Keep it scoped to this one fix. When you're done, summarise what you changed and list any TODOs.
Publish popcorn.zone/docs/guides/why-ai-recommends-a-competitor high documentation effort M flips 4 Getting recommended instead of a competitor
Where: popcorn.zone/docs/guides/why-ai-recommends-a-competitor
Must say: Explain the diagnosis loop step by step: ask your buyer questions repeatedly, and separate what the model finds by searching from what it believes with no tools. Then record the top pick, the products named and the objections raised, and trace the citations behind them. Show how Popcorn automates each step and turns objections into specific page fixes, using a sample graded answer as the example.
Done when: Prompts 1, 2 or 4 on the search track cite this guide in at least 1 answer.
Displaces: https://everything-pr.com/why-chatgpt-recommends-competitors
Why: P2: no Popcorn page surfaced; answers were built from everything-pr.com/why-chatgpt-recommends-competitors and help.otterly.ai.
Prompt for Claude Code
# Publish popcorn.zone/docs/guides/why-ai-recommends-a-competitor When buyers ask an AI assistant the questions below, it doesn't recommend us, or recommends us for the wrong reasons. This is a documentation gap: the answer needed a page we don't have, or ours says the wrong thing. ## The questions it affects - ChatGPT keeps recommending our competitor instead of us. What can we actually do about it? - How can I find out why an AI assistant prefers a competitor's product over ours? - ChatGPT gets our features and pricing wrong. How do we correct what AI assistants say about our product? - AI assistants mention our product but add caveats that steer buyers away. How do we address the objections they raise? ## What the assistant said P2: no Popcorn page surfaced; answers were built from everything-pr.com/why-chatgpt-recommends-competitors and help.otterly.ai. ## Who wins the question today https://everything-pr.com/why-chatgpt-recommends-competitors. Read it and make sure our version answers everything it does, better. ## Your task Write or update the page at popcorn.zone/docs/guides/why-ai-recommends-a-competitor so it closes this gap. Find where pages like this live in the repo, match their structure, front matter and tone, and make the change there. If the page exists, edit it rather than starting over. ## What it must say Explain the diagnosis loop step by step: ask your buyer questions repeatedly, and separate what the model finds by searching from what it believes with no tools. Then record the top pick, the products named and the objections raised, and trace the citations behind them. Show how Popcorn automates each step and turns objections into specific page fixes, using a sample graded answer as the example. ## Done when Prompts 1, 2 or 4 on the search track cite this guide in at least 1 answer. ## Rules - Don't invent numbers, benchmarks, prices, capabilities or customer names. Where a fact is needed and you can't find it in the repo or on our site, leave a clearly marked TODO saying exactly what to measure or who to ask. - Answer the questions above directly and early on the page, in the words buyers use. AI assistants quote pages that state the answer plainly. - Keep it scoped to this one fix. When you're done, summarise what you changed and list any TODOs.